Knowing the One: Provisionality in Parmenides and Plato
ثبت نشده
چکیده
The notion of the one is a central element in the thought of Parmenides and Plato. At issue are two relationships: that between one and many, and that being and becoming, and the possibility of acquiring knowledge about these relationships. Parmenides is traditionally understood as unequivocally equating being, one and thought with one another; hence denying multiplicity and becoming while proclaiming that all that can be known is unchanging being. Following Reiner Schürmann’s reading in his essay “Tragic Differing: The Law of the One and the Law of the Contraries in Parmenides,” which emphasizes the symmetry of the ascent and descent of the narrative journey presented in Parmenides’ poem, we find that Parmenides actually speaks to the mortal inescapability of difference and the need to bring an intuitive understanding of the one and being to our everyday dealings with difference and becoming if we wish to act in accord with Justice. Plato may be seen as both integrating and surpassing the thought of his predecessor. In his dialogue Parmenides a one that is prior to being is demonstrated to be unthinkable, and the notion of participation is shown to be a way of conceiving the inconceivable. Similarly the Republic presents a Good that is above being, yet apprehendable to the extent that it enables the perception of eternal forms. The ascent of knowledge presented in the Pheadrus again suggests the potential for approaching eternal being while denying the possibility of full knowledge, and reinforces the notion that our search is erotically fueled. In his poem Parmenides narrates his ascent from the doxa of the mortal world, marked by contraries and becoming, to the aletheia of the immortal realm, in which a goddess teaches him that true being is one, unmoving, unchanging and uniform, and subsequent descent as the goddess describes a reverse passage from aletheia back to doxa. While in many ways Parmenides presents himself as being the passive recipient of revelation — he is carried by “wise horses” and
منابع مشابه
Plato’s Parmenides: Interpretations and Solutions to the Third Man
Plato’s Parmenides fulfills a special role in understanding Plato’s theory of Forms. Throughout his dialogues, Plato is pleased to invoke the theory intermittently, often as ancillary support for related pieces of his philosophy. But the theory itself remains concealed, even mysterious, never giving up a broad exposure for the reader’s immediate analysis. Hence, what we know of Plato’s Forms co...
متن کاملPlato Seeking for “One Real Explanation” in Phaedo
What this essay is to discuss is Plato''s theory of explanation in Phaedo. In this dialogue, we observe that Socrates criticizes both the natural scientists’ explanations and Anaxagoras’ theory of Mind since he thinks they could not explain all things, firstly, in a unitary and, secondary, in a real way. Thence, we are to call what Plato is seeking as his ideal explanation in Phaedo “One Real E...
متن کاملA two-worlds, two-semantics interpretation of Plato’s Sophist
The avowed purpose of Plato’s Sophist is to characterize the sophist. In the first part of his book, Plato employs the method of divisions to obtain this characterization, and eventually arrives at the conclusion that the sophist is an imitator and that “there is an art, concerned with speeches, by which it is possible to beguile the young” (234c). From here it is short shrift to arrive at the ...
متن کاملCarlo Michelstaedter: Persuasion and Rhetoric
Carlo Michelstaedter’s Persuasion and Rhetoric (1910) is one of the best examples of what Massimo Cacciari calls the early twentieth century “metaphysics of youth.” Persuasion and Rhetoric is the result of Michelstaedter’s academic investigation on the concepts of “persuasion” and “rhetoric” in Plato and Aristotle. Michelstaedter saw in Plato’s corpus the gradual abandonment of Parmenidean “bei...
متن کاملPlato and Divination
Plato uses the idea of divinatory knowledge as a metaphorical descriptor for a variety of kinds of daytime, waking knowing. What unites these examples is that they all include discussion of a kind of knowing that cannot account for itself, and that is tentative, imagistic and non-discursive. These metaphorical uses can further be illuminated by his more detailed discussion of divinatory knowled...
متن کامل